The Problematic History of Madeline S. M. Lee
This is a permanent digital archive documenting a prolonged pattern of stalking, harassment, and retaliatory litigation associated with Madeline Sally Machla Lee, aka The Internet Personality known as Pojo Kutty; as reflected in court records, platform actions, and preserved communications.
Lee publicly embraces sexual provocation as resistance, publishes explicit material intentionally, and frames sexuality as a form of subversion of authority.
The record also reflects a recurring contradiction: the same public expression later becomes the basis for demands that state authority be used to silence critics, characterize public speech as abuse, and restrict access to material that was voluntarily made public under her own accounts.
The archive documents this tension as a reputational and narrative conflict reflected in filings, platform actions, and preserved communications, rather than as a question of private trauma. The focus of this page is the record and its chronology.
Who Is Madeline Lee?
Madeline Sally "Machla" Lee (formerly Fleigle) is a self-described "sexual educator" and online personality who, over a period of years, has repeatedly involved herself in adversarial conflicts with other women through social-media campaigns, legal filings across multiple jurisdictions, and extensive narrative reconstruction.
Publicly and in filings, Lee has presented herself as a victim requiring protection while simultaneously initiating or amplifying actions that resulted in law enforcement contact, domestic-abuse court proceedings, civil litigation, and platform enforcement directed at those she identified as adversaries.
The record reflects a recurring structure: allegations are made, urgency is asserted, third parties are mobilized, and contradictions surface once contemporaneous documentation is preserved. When challenged, narratives shift; when questioned, records fragment. The pattern that remains is not a single incident but a repeated sequence of escalation and reframing.
This archive exists because that sequence left a traceable evidentiary trail — screenshots, filings, timestamps, metadata, and sworn statements — that remains internally consistent when reviewed chronologically.
Materials included here also document instances in which public narratives of danger or hardship were accompanied by requests for financial support or assistance, even while parallel representations portrayed stability or success. These materials are presented as part of the documentary record without inference beyond what the underlying sources establish.
Grifting, Stalking, and Child Safety Concerns
Madeline Lee maintains an extensive public footprint across multiple social-media platforms, operating under an umbrella of aliases. Over a period of years, she has cultivated a highly sexualized online persona framed around a self-described form of "Marxism," frequently presenting nudity and erotic performance as political, educational, or artistic expression.
This public-facing identity blends explicit sexual content, informal digital "education," and ideological branding into a curated presentation positioned as socially conscious, feminist, and justice-oriented, while also functioning as a mechanism for audience attention, credibility, and mobilization.
Separate from her online presentation, available records reflect multiple child-safety–related referrals and contacts with county authorities. Documentation indicates independently initiated contacts involving Children's Services in Hennepin County and Ramsey County during June and July 2024, along with preserved complaints raising concerns about conduct during that period.
This archive does not speculate on investigative outcomes beyond what is documented. It preserves the existence, timing, and volume of these referrals and contacts as part of the evidentiary record, as they are relevant to the public narratives and third-party interventions associated with the incidents documented here.
What Is Madeline's Background?
Before adopting the name Pojo Kutty HaZonah, Madeline Sally Machla Lee operated publicly under the alias Leelee Cocodrie. It was under that name that she first made contact while I was operating as a monetized content creator on platforms operated by Meta. That interaction marked the beginning of sustained contact and attempts to attach to my online visibility and audience.
As engagement increased, Lee began circulating my name across multiple platforms, including YouTube, WhatsApp, Bluesky, Facebook, and Telegram. During this period, her public framing shifted away from primarily erotic self-branding and toward a narrative of personal victimhood that generated increased visibility and audience interaction.
In her own statements and posts, Lee and associated accounts promoted the normalization of explicit sexual display as a social good, frequently justified using rhetoric centered on empowerment, liberation, and safety.
Concerns documented in the record arise where this rhetoric intersected with discussions involving children and youth, framed as efforts to make others "comfortable with sexuality" or to prevent abuse. These statements and materials are preserved here as part of the public record and are presented without inference beyond what was posted and circulated.
Documented Risk and Public-Safety Concerns
Madeline Sally Machla Lee has previously worked within Minnesota school systems and has publicly posted images and descriptions of classroom environments and the children she worked with. Due to the nature of that material, most such images are not reproduced here.
At the same time, Lee has maintained an extensive public history of advocating for openness around sexuality and sexual expression. When her conduct is questioned or criticized, the response pattern documented in the record involves rapid escalation to allegations of abuse or harassment directed at third parties, including law enforcement, courts, social-media platforms, and service providers.
The issue presented here is not disagreement with ideology, but the repeated intersection between sexualized content, children's environments, and allegations triggered by scrutiny. These conditions are presented in the archive because they raise boundary and safeguarding concerns reflected in the record.
Preserved materials and documentation reflect multiple reports to child-protection authorities on separate occasions. This archive preserves the existence and timing of those reports without asserting investigative outcomes beyond what the record establishes.
In court filings, Lee characterized alleged screenshots of text messages as "private sexual images" and asserted that their existence constituted harassment, notwithstanding that similar or more explicit material was being distributed publicly under accounts associated with her at the same time.
Preserved records also document the operation of multiple public channels — including Telegram — where explicit sexual content involving Lee and others was distributed. These materials are included as part of the documentary record to contextualize the claims, responses, and enforcement actions described elsewhere in this archive.
How Is Social Media Involved?
A significant portion of the harassment documented in this archive originates from coordinated activity on Facebook and related platforms.
Public profiles associated with Pojo Kutty HaZonah — including "Pojo Kutty HaZonah / Sakhav Pojo HaZonah", "Slam / Slammy Cunningham", and "Kim Gordon / Karlie Haler" — engaged in sustained, high-frequency posting behavior directed at strangers for the purpose of provoking engagement.
Preserved records reflect the use of multiple alternate accounts to evade enforcement and to mass-report targets. These profiles function as a loose network rather than as isolated actors.
Targets are routinely mocked using personal characteristics, including disability, gender expression, age, physical appearance, and neurodivergence.
Across platforms, engagement is driven by repeated accusations — including claims of racism, sexual misconduct, drug use, stalking, and violence — coupled with demands that targets "prove innocence." When documentary rebuttal is provided, mass-reporting typically follows.
The behavior documented here extends beyond isolated posts. Participants track targets across platforms, including Facebook groups, image boards, Discord servers, and private messaging channels, creating continuity of harassment rather than discrete incidents.
In several instances, online activity escalated into real-world consequences. Once a target's associates, offline identity, or family members are identified, those individuals become secondary targets.
Documented tactics include police reports, civil filings, registrar abuse complaints, phone calls, letters, immigration-related reports, and restraining-order petitions supported by altered or misleading screenshots. These tools are repeatedly deployed following online disputes.
Responding to lawsuits and false allegations is then used as further fodder for accusations of being "litigious" or "unhinged." As of , my personal and public Facebook accounts were permanently disabled following coordinated reporting campaigns.
But Who Is Onion Madder?
I have operated under the name Onion Madder online since 2003. Long before the term "content creator" entered common use, I was publishing, experimenting, and building audiences across early internet platforms using a mix of art, technical work, humor, and interactive media.
Over time, this work has included pinup modeling, competitive speedrunning (including verified world records), educational video production, interactive fiction, and the release of numerous independent games under my own imprint.
I also built and maintained a large-scale alternate-reality project spanning hundreds of pages and multiple interconnected domains, and was contracted as a content creator for Meta-owned platforms for a period of approximately three years.
In parallel, I have operated multiple small businesses and creative ventures under my own name and brand — including Nodehole and Mess o Pedals — while living with a permanent disability since my early twenties.
This context establishes baseline chronology and professional background prior to the events documented in this archive. The body of work, audience, and public presence associated with the Onion Madder name predate the conflicts described elsewhere on this page.
I was already here.
Why Did Pojo Focus on Onion?
Prior to adopting the Pojo Kutty persona, Madeline Sally Machla Lee operated publicly under the name Leelee Cocodrie in left-leaning online communities. During that period, the identity became the subject of sustained internal conflict and public criticism following allegations circulated within those spaces concerning misuse of funds and personal misconduct.
Around this time, Lee began following my accounts while still using the Leelee Cocodrie name. Shortly thereafter, she initiated contact with members of my social circle — including my husband and his acquaintances — without prior relationship or context.
The record reflects a recurring pattern: when an existing identity becomes untenable, a new persona is constructed, accompanied by the acquisition of a fresh audience and the re-targeting of individuals with established visibility.
A Tangled Web
Over time, information surfaced publicly indicating that Lee was simultaneously maintaining multiple romantic engagements, primarily with individuals located in India, without disclosure between parties. These revelations emerged independently of my involvement and circulated widely online.
During this period, Lee was the subject of ongoing public criticism. At the time, I chose to defend her against what appeared to be disproportionate ridicule, believing she was experiencing compounding personal and social pressure. My intent was de-escalation, not amplification.
Shortly thereafter, additional accounts emerged from individuals previously connected to Lee, raising concerns about disclosure, sexual health, and conflicting narratives surrounding consent and risk. These accounts are preserved in the archive as part of the public record without inference beyond what was reported and circulated.
Rather than resolving the situation, these disclosures added further complexity to an already unstable network of relationships, accusations, and identity reconstruction. The materials are included here to establish chronology and context for subsequent conflicts documented elsewhere in this archive.
The Cruelty Documented in the Record
During later conversations, an individual previously accused by Madeline Sally Machla Lee of sexual abuse provided a detailed account of the events underlying that allegation. This archive preserves his statements as testimony and reported narrative, not as findings of fact.
According to his account, the two had an established sexual relationship and were involved in what he believed to be an exclusive, long-term partnership. On the night in question, consensual sexual activity occurred, followed by a request that he later understood to be unwelcome.
He stated that, at the time the allegation was made public, he believed it would be inappropriate to challenge a woman's claim of sexual abuse. He described internal conflict shaped by ideological commitments and prevailing norms within left-leaning spaces, particularly the emphasis on believing accusers without requiring evidentiary dispute.
What followed, according to his statements, was not separation or closure. Instead, Lee continued to maintain contact with him over an extended period, repeatedly framing him as uniquely culpable and herself as the sole person capable of understanding his actions. He described this dynamic as isolating and psychologically destabilizing.
This archive does not adjudicate the truth of competing narratives about consent. It documents a separate, observable pattern reflected in preserved communications: the prolonged presence of an unresolved accusation alongside continued contact, dependency, and silence.
When I later withdrew public support for Lee, the pattern of retaliation documented elsewhere in this archive began.
Manipulation, Triangulation, and Narrative Control
The escalation began with unsolicited messages from former friends and acquaintances expressing concern about my mental health. While some framed their outreach as care, others repeated allegations attributed to Madeline Sally Machla Lee, including claims that I was violent, threatening, or unstable.
During the same period these claims circulated privately and publicly, Lee submitted statements to the court asserting that she was not involved in coordinating outside contact. Preserved communications reflect a discrepancy between those assertions and contemporaneous messaging activity.
When I attempted to address the situation directly and set boundaries, that outreach was reframed as harassment. Communications intended to stop third-party contact were selectively presented to courts as evidence of wrongdoing.
After repeated unsolicited contact from Lee's friends, partners, and associates, I issued a cease-and-desist letter requesting that my personal contact information no longer be shared and that third-party contact stop.
That same letter was then presented to multiple audiences in conflicting ways: as evidence of harassment in legal filings, and as justification for ridicule and escalation within online communities.
Across these interactions, a consistent pattern is reflected in the record: provocation, selective documentation, removal of context, and subsequent presentation of that material as proof of abuse. Attempts to disengage or defend boundaries were incorporated into the same narrative rather than resolving it.
The preserved chronology does not reflect a single discrete conflict. It reflects a feedback loop in which accusation produces reaction, reaction is reframed as evidence, and that evidence is used to justify further escalation.
A History of Escalation and Harm
Over time, Madeline Sally Machla Lee has repeatedly mobilized public "callout" campaigns on social media, particularly within left-leaning Facebook spaces, directing attention and hostility toward individuals who criticize or disengage from her.
During the period in which I was being publicly targeted, multiple individuals contacted me independently to describe prior experiences in which Lee had similarly focused attention on them, resulting in sustained harassment and eventual withdrawal from online spaces.
Across these incidents, a consistent dual structure appears in the record: outward-facing recruitment and victim framing paired with private denial of coordination or responsibility. These parallel narratives do not remain internally consistent when reviewed chronologically.
When contradictions are raised, responsibility is routinely displaced onto third parties — friends, romantic partners, followers, or strangers — rather than addressed directly.
Rather than resolving over time, the behavior escalated. Approximately six months after the initial campaign began, Lee shared my personal phone number with an individual named Sumit Sinha, whom she had recently met through an online dating platform. He then contacted me directly.
Following this exchange, Sinha located a public post I had made describing the incident and responded by publishing my husband's full legal name alongside personal assertions about his relationship with Lee.
In Lee's subsequent response to my civil lawsuit, she stated that Sinha had contacted me respectfully and independently and that she had not provided him with my contact information.
These representations conflict with the preserved sequence of events. The same pattern appears repeatedly in the record: third-party involvement occurs, responsibility is disclaimed, and contradictory explanations are offered depending on audience.
By , after months of sustained contact, escalation, and narrative contradiction, I filed a civil action seeking relief and an end to the conduct.
Two audiences. Two versions. One record.
The Campaign Expands
By May 2025, the same sexual-assault allegation first circulated by Ewan Leask in August 2024 was being repeated widely by Lee's friends, followers, and associates. The claim appeared across multiple platforms without new evidence or firsthand accounts.
During this period, my likeness was incorporated into memes, and large volumes of public commentary from strangers labeled me a rapist, a Nazi, racist, transphobic, and violent. These characterizations were repeated by individuals with no prior relationship to me.
I also received direct messages from individuals local to me asserting that they would "hex" me or warn others to exclude me from organizing spaces. These communications mirrored the same narrative framing circulating publicly.
As the campaign intensified, I lost professional contracts, social media accounts, followers, and longstanding personal relationships. I was forced to abandon existing work and begin rebuilding my livelihood while responding to sustained third-party contact generated by the allegations.
Personal photographs were repurposed as memes by third parties, further extending the reach of the campaign. These actions occurred concurrently with sworn statements asserting fear and lack of coordination.
During this phase, my post-traumatic stress disorder was referenced repeatedly in public discourse, with reactions to the harassment later cited as evidence of instability. The feedback loop became self-reinforcing.
Public claims of fear coincided with private encouragement of continued engagement. Allegations attributed to me appeared in parallel with conduct directed toward me by others.
My inbox continued to fill with unsolicited messages from individuals repeating the same claims. Many stated explicitly that they had learned of me through Lee or her associates.
Mass-reporting campaigns were then initiated against my remaining social media accounts, with participants openly celebrating their removal.
After I withdrew from most social media platforms, the same tactics shifted toward registrar abuse complaints and DMCA takedown requests directed at my legal archive.
The expansion was not limited to a single platform or moment. It followed a repeatable structure: allegation, amplification, enforcement, and displacement. By the time formal responses were possible in court, the reputational and economic harm had already occurred.
The record reflects propagation rather than isolation.
Escalation to the Courts
Following months of online escalation, the dispute entered the court system. Despite publicly presenting herself as financially unstable, Madeline Sally Machla Lee retained legal representation from a municipal defense firm with an established record representing landlord and government interests.
The transition from online allegation to formal legal process marked a shift in tactics. Claims previously circulated through social media were introduced into judicial proceedings, where procedural mechanisms replaced public persuasion.
The matter was assigned to Referee Elizabeth Clysdale. Publicly available litigation records reflect prior allegations concerning the incorporation of social-media activity into judicial decision-making in unrelated matters.
In prior federal litigation, it was alleged that Referee Clysdale relied on online narratives and external characterizations when issuing rulings, resulting in claims of irregular or retaliatory judicial conduct.
The procedural posture of this case reflects a similar sequence: allegations first circulated online, then reintroduced through court filings, where they were treated as presumptively credible without independent evidentiary testing.